From Hitler’s “Criminal Jews” to Trump’s “Criminal Immigrants & Immigration”

The Resistance Reports

March 8, 2017

The Trump administration is planning to radically expand the program and facilities for the detention of immigrant families seeking asylum in the United States, according to documents obtained exclusively by All In (source).

“If implemented, this expansion in immigration detention would be the fastest and largest in our country’s history,” says Andrew Free, an immigration lawyer in Nashville who represents clients applying for asylum. “And my worry is it’ll be permanent. Once those beds are in place they’ll never go away.”

And about a week ago, White House was softening up Trump’s words that that deportations of immigrants are ‘a military operation’ likely to calm the situation. That comes on top of earlier news said ICE is having a hiring surge, with plans for 10,000 more officers.

So what is going on?

Trump administration officials seek to tempter president’s suggestion that military involved in immigration round up. White House press secretary Sean Spicer insisted that the deportation of people illegally in the US is not a military operation after the president indicated it is.

But whet ever it is, with earlier news that ICE is hiring 10,000 more officers, Trump’s deportations is certainly, at the least ‘a para-military operation.’

Trump also read out the names of the US citizens murdered by illegal immigrants. Christopher Hooton has pointed out a likeness between Trump’s latest policy development and an article from Nazi paper ‘The Criminal Jew,’ which published photos of Jewish people who had committed crimes including pickpocketing.

Taken from the book Hitler’s Ethic: The Nazi Pursuit of Evolutionary Progress by professor Richard Weikart, the text explains that “In 1943, a Nazi directive to the German press declared, ‘Jews are criminal by disposition. The Jews are not a nation like other nations but bearers of hereditary criminality.’”

During Trump campaign for presidency, he said he would expel all illegal immigrants from America, and the estimated number is between 10 to 15 million people, raising alarm that Trump will need processing camps, or in other call, internment camps.

The following is a report from the Independent (source)

Donald Trump’s ‘mass deportation plan’ must be stopped, says Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer

It is ‘a waste of limited resources, disrupts our economy, does nothing to keep us safe, and makes everyone a target’, says the senior Democrat

A senior Democratic senator has lashed out at what he called Donald Trump‘s “mass deportation plan” and said it “must be stopped”.

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said that the White House was planning to “round up and quickly deport anyone who is undocumented”.

Memos released by Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly showed the department plans to prioritise the removal of undocumented immigrants who “have been convicted of any criminal offence”, following directives from the President.

This will include those who “have abused any programme related to receipt of public benefits”.

Senator Schumer said: “No matter how much they deny it, it is clear that the White House is setting in motion their mass deportation plan, directing immigration agents to round up and quickly deport anyone who is undocumented.

“We can all agree that violent criminals should be removed, but it is outrageous and unacceptable for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to target or arrest innocent immigrant families contributing to our nation and working to achieve the American Dream.”

He added that it was “a waste of limited resources, disrupts our economy, does nothing to keep us safe, and makes everyone a target—causing panic within the immigrant community.”

Mr Trump’s sweeping immigration enforcement directives will allow for more deportations than those in place during the Obama administration, according to the memos released by the Department of Homeland Security.

Last month, the President signed two executive orders relating to the border with Mexico. The first directed the construction of a wall, despite the existence of some 700 miles of barrier already in place along the 1989 mile border.

The second boosted the number of border patrol agents and immigration enforcement officers who carry out raids and deportations. Mr Kelly’s memo essentially makes the latter into agency policy, and provides a framework for its implementation.

“Criminal aliens have demonstrated their disregard for the rule of law and pose a threat to persons residing in the United States. As such, criminal aliens are a priority for removal,” Mr Kelly said in the memo, adding he had directed ICE to hire 10,000 more agents “expeditiously”.

The language of the memo opens the door for more wide scale deportation operations.

The Obama administration carried out the largest number of deportations – almost three million.

However, it prioritised undocumented immigrants who were convicted of serious crimes. The new DHS guidelines would allow ICE officers to remove a larger category of people, including those who have committed petty crimes.

In addition to the hiring of new agents, the DHS is looking to expand the number of detention facilities and establish a new Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Office.

It would also revive a programme, known as 287(g), that would give local police the authority to act as immigration enforcement officers.

The directive will also expand expedited removals of undocumented immigrants.

Previously, US border patrol and ICE agents only had the authority to immediately remove people within 100 miles of the border who had been in the country for 14 days but the new policy allows for the quick removal of people who have been anywhere in US for up to two years.

Mr Trump took to Twitter to defend a series of immigration raids.

“The crackdown on illegal criminals is merely the keeping of my campaign promise,” he wrote. “Gang members, drug dealers & others are being removed!”

Gillian Christensen, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, said the raids were part of “routine” immigration enforcement actions.

Popular culture believes America was built by immigrants and so America has much welcomed immigrants, throughout the country’s history. But there are times that immigrants are not welcomed and internally, minority are sent to camps, such as the Japanese during WWII. The stature of Liberty is the symbol that lingers.

The Statue of Liberty

The Statue of Liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World; French: La Liberté éclairant le monde) is a colossal neoclassical sculpture on Liberty Island in New York Harbor in New York City, in the United States. The copper statue, a gift from the people of France to the people of the United States, was designed by French sculptor Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi and built by Gustave Eiffel. The statue was dedicated on October 28, 1886.

The Statue of Liberty is a robed female figure representing Libertas, the Roman goddess. She holds a torch above her head, and in her left arm carries a tabula ansata (a tablet evoking the law) inscribed “July 4, 1776”, the date of the American Declaration of Independence. A broken chain lies at her feet. The statue became an icon of freedom and of the United States, and was a welcoming sight to immigrants arriving from abroad.

Bartholdi was inspired by French law professor and politician Édouard René de Laboulaye, who is said to have commented in 1865 that any monument raised to American independence would properly be a joint project of the French and American peoples. Due to the post-war instability in France, work on the statue did not commence until the early 1870s. In 1875, Laboulaye proposed that the French finance the statue and the Americans would provide the site and build the pedestal. Bartholdi completed the head and the torch-bearing arm before the statue was fully designed, and these pieces were exhibited for publicity at international expositions.

The torch-bearing arm was displayed at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia in 1876, and in Madison Square Park in Manhattan from 1876 to 1882. Fundraising proved difficult, especially for the Americans, and by 1885 work on the pedestal was threatened due to lack of funds. Publisher Joseph Pulitzer of the New York World started a drive for donations to complete the project that attracted more than 120,000 contributors, most of whom gave less than a dollar. The statue was constructed in France, shipped overseas in crates, and assembled on the completed pedestal on what was then called Bedloe’s Island. The statue’s completion was marked by New York’s first ticker-tape parade and a dedication ceremony presided over by President Grover Cleveland.

The statue was administered by the United States Lighthouse Board until 1901 and then by the Department of War; since 1933 it has been maintained by the National Park Service. Public access to the balcony surrounding the torch has been barred for safety reasons

Immigration to the United States

Immigration to the United States is the international movement of individuals who are not natives or do not possess citizenship in order to settle, reside, study or to take-up employment in the United States. It has been a major source of population growth and cultural change throughout much of the history of the United States. The economic, social, and political aspects of immigration have caused controversy regarding ethnicity, economic benefits, jobs for non-immigrants, settlement patterns, impact on upward social mobility, crime, and voting behavior.

Prior to 1965, policies such as the national origins formula limited immigration and naturalization opportunities for people from areas outside Western Europe. Exclusion laws enacted as early as the 1880s generally prohibited or severely restricted immigration from Asia, and quota laws enacted in the 1920s curtailed Eastern European immigration. The civil rights movement of the 1960s led to the replacement[1] of these ethnic quotas with per-country limits.[2] Since then, the number of first-generation immigrants living in the United States has quadrupled.[3][4]

As for economic effects, research suggests that immigration to the United States is beneficial to the US economy. Research, with few exceptions, finds that immigration on average has positive economic effects on the native population, but is mixed as to whether low-skilled immigration adversely affects low-skilled natives. Research finds that immigration either has no impact on the crime rate or that it reduces the crime rate in the United States. Research shows that the United States excels at assimilating first- and second-generation immigrants relative to many other Western countries.


Main article: History of immigration to the United States

American immigration history can be viewed in four epochs: the colonial period, the mid-19th century, the start of the 20th century, and post-1965. Each period brought distinct national groups, races and ethnicities to the United States. During the 17th century, approximately 400,000 English people migrated to Colonial America.[5] Over half of all European immigrants to Colonial America during the 17th and 18th centuries arrived as indentured servants.[6] The mid-19th century saw mainly an influx from northern Europe; the early 20th-century mainly from Southern and Eastern Europe; post-1965 mostly from Latin America and Asia.

Historians estimate that fewer than 1 million immigrants came to the United States from Europe between 1600 and 1799.[7] The 1790 Act limited naturalization to “free white persons”; it was expanded to include blacks in the 1860s and Asians in the 1950s.[8] In the early years of the United States, immigration was fewer than 8,000 people a year,[9] including French refugees from the slave revolt in Haiti. After 1820, immigration gradually increased. From 1836 to 1914, over 30 million Europeans migrated to the United States.[10] The death rate on these transatlantic voyages was high, during which one in seven travelers died.[11] In 1875, the nation passed its first immigration law, the Page Act of 1875.[12]

After an initial wave of immigration from China following the California Gold Rush, Congress passed a series of laws culminating in the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, banning virtually all immigration from China until the law’s repeal in 1943. In the late 1800s, immigration from other Asian countries, especially to the West Coast, became more common.

The peak year of European immigration was in 1907, when 1,285,349 persons entered the country.[13] By 1910, 13.5 million immigrants were living in the United States.[14] In 1921, the Congress passed the Emergency Quota Act, followed by the Immigration Act of 1924. The 1924 Act was aimed at further restricting immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, particularly Jews, Italians, and Slavs, who had begun to enter the country in large numbers beginning in the 1890s, and consolidated the prohibition of Asian immigration.[15]

Immigration patterns of the 1930s were dominated by the Great Depression. In the final prosperous year, 1929, there were 279,678 immigrants recorded,[16] but in 1933, only 23,068 came to the U.S.[7] In the early 1930s, more people emigrated from the United States than to it.[17] The U.S. government sponsored a Mexican Repatriation program which was intended to encourage people to voluntarily move to Mexico, but thousands were deported against their will.[18] Altogether about 400,000 Mexicans were repatriated.[19] Most of the Jewish refugees fleeing the Nazis and World War II were barred from coming to the United States.[20] In the post-war era, the Justice Department launched Operation Wetback, under which 1,075,168 Mexicans were deported in 1954.[21]

First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same…. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset…. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia…. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.

— Ted Kennedy, chief Senate sponsor of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.[22]

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Cellar Act, abolished the system of national-origin quotas. By equalizing immigration policies, the act resulted in new immigration from non-European nations, which changed the ethnic make-up of the United States.[23] In 1970, 60% of immigrants were from Europe; this decreased to 15% by 2000.[24] In 1990, George H. W. Bush signed the Immigration Act of 1990,[25] which increased legal immigration to the United States by 40%.[26] In 1991, Bush signed the Armed Forces Immigration Adjustment Act 1991, allowing foreign service members who had serve 12 or more years in the US Armed Forces to qualify for permanent residency and, in some cases, citizenship.

In November 1994, California voters passed Proposition 187 amending the state constitution, denying state financial aid to illegal immigrants. The federal courts voided this change, ruling that it violated the federal constitution.[27]

Appointed by Bill Clinton,[28] the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform recommended reducing legal immigration from about 800,000 people per year to approximately 550,000.[29] While an influx of new residents from different cultures presents some challenges, “the United States has always been energized by its immigrant populations,” said President Bill Clinton in 1998. “America has constantly drawn strength and spirit from wave after wave of immigrants […] They have proved to be the most restless, the most adventurous, the most innovative, the most industrious of people.”[30]

In 2001, President George W. Bush discussed an accord with Mexican President Vincente Fox. Possible accord was derailed by the September 11 attacks. From 2005 to 2013, the US Congress discussed various ways of controlling immigration. The Senate and House are unable to reach an agreement. In 2012 and 2014, President Obama initiated policies that were intended to ease the pressure on deporting people using anchor babies as a means of immigrating to the United States.[27]

Nearly 14 million immigrants entered the United States from 2000 to 2010,[31] and over one million persons were naturalized as U.S. citizens in 2008. The per-country limit[2] applies the same maximum on the number of visas to all countries regardless of their population and has therefore had the effect of significantly restricting immigration of persons born in populous nations such as Mexico, China, India, and the Philippines—the leading countries of origin for legally admitted immigrants to the United States in 2013;[32] nevertheless, China, India, and Mexico were the leading countries of origin for immigrants overall to the United States in 2013, regardless of legal status, according to a U.S. Census Bureau study.[33] As of 2009, 66% of legal immigrants were admitted on the basis of family ties, along with 13% admitted for their employment skills and 17% for humanitarian reasons.[34]

Nearly 8 million people immigrated to the United States from 2000 to 2005; 3.7 million of them entered without papers.[35][36] In 1986 president Ronald Reagan signed immigration reform that gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants in the country.[37] Hispanic immigrants suffered job losses during the late-2000s recession,[38] but since the recession’s end in June 2009, immigrants posted a net gain of 656,000 jobs.[39] Over 1 million immigrants were granted legal residence in 2011.[40]

For those who enter the US illegally across the Mexico–United States border and elsewhere, migration is difficult, expensive and dangerous.[41] Virtually all undocumented immigrants have no avenues for legal entry to the United States due to the restrictive legal limits on green cards, and lack of immigrant visas for low-skilled workers.[42] Participants in debates on immigration in the early twenty-first century called for increasing enforcement of existing laws governing illegal immigration to the United States, building a barrier along some or all of the 2,000-mile (3,200 km) Mexico-U.S. border, or creating a new guest worker program. Through much of 2006 the country and Congress was immersed in a debate about these proposals. As of April 2010 few of these proposals had become law, though a partial border fence had been approved and subsequently canceled.[43]

In January 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order temporarily suspending entry to the US from Yemen, Sudan, Somalia, Iraq, Iran, and Libya, and a suspension of entry from Syria for an indefinite period.[44][45] The order also limited the number of refugees permitted to enter the United States in 2017 to 50,000 and suspended the United States Refugee Admissions Program for 120 to allow authorities to review the application and adjudication processes.[46] A second executive order called for the immediate construction of a wall across the U.S.–Mexico border, the hiring of 5,000 new border patrol agents and 10,000 new immigration officers, and federal funding penalties for Sanctuary Cities.[47]

On February 3, 2017, a federal judge in Washington State ordered a nationwide halt to the enforcement of Trump’s executive action.[48] And on February 4, 2017, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security suspended the rules that flagged travelers under the executive order.[49]

Contemporary immigration

Until the 1930s most legal immigrants were male. By the 1990s women accounted for just over half of all legal immigrants.[51] Contemporary immigrants tend to be younger than the native population of the United States, with people between the ages of 15 and 34 substantially overrepresented.[52] Immigrants are also more likely to be married and less likely to be divorced than native-born Americans of the same age.[53]

Immigrants are likely to move to and live in areas populated by people with similar backgrounds. This phenomenon has held true throughout the history of immigration to the United States.[54] Seven out of ten immigrants surveyed by Public Agenda in 2009 said they intended to make the U.S. their permanent home, and 71% said if they could do it over again they would still come to the US. In the same study, 76% of immigrants say the government has become stricter on enforcing immigration laws since the September 11, 2001 attacks (“9/11”), and 24% report that they personally have experienced some or a great deal of discrimination.[55]

Public attitudes about immigration in the U.S. were heavily influenced in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. After the attacks, 52% of Americans believed that immigration was a good thing overall for the U.S., down from 62% the year before, according to a 2009 Gallup poll.[56] A 2008 Public Agenda survey found that half of Americans said tighter controls on immigration would do “a great deal” to enhance U.S. national security.[57] Harvard political scientist and historian Samuel P. Huntington argued in Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity that a potential future consequence of continuing massive immigration from Latin America, especially Mexico, might lead to the bifurcation of the United States.

The population of illegal Mexican immigrants in the US fell from approximately 7 million in 2007 to 6.1 million in 2011[58] Commentators link the reversal of the immigration trend to the economic downturn that started in 2008 and which meant fewer available jobs, and to the introduction of tough immigration laws in many states.[59][60][61][62] According to the Pew Hispanic Center the total number of Mexican born persons had stagnated in 2010, and tended toward going into negative figures.[63]

More than 80 cities in the United States,[64] including Washington D.C., New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, San Diego, San Jose, Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, Detroit, Jersey City, Minneapolis, Miami, Denver, Baltimore, Seattle, Portland, Oregon and Portland, Maine, have sanctuary policies, which vary locally.[65]

The following are some news link:

DHS Hiring 10,000 ICE Agents As 950,000 Illegals With Deportation …

DHS Authorizes Hiring 10K Immigration Officers – Breitbart

Trump to spare US ‘dreamer’ immigrants from crackdown –

Trump to spare U.S. ‘dreamer’ immigrants from crackdown | Reuters

US immigration raids leave many ‘afraid to open the door’ – BBC News

Trump administration widens net for immigrant deportation – BBC News

Trump admin sets stage for mass deportations –

Millions targeted for possible deportation under Trump rules | WTOP

New Trump immigration orders target nearly all illegal immigrants in US

US ramps up crackdown on undocumented immigrants | USA News …

US Immigration News –

DHS Outlines Crackdown on Illegal Immigration – NBC News

Us Immigration News: Latest News, Photos, Videos on Us Immigration …

Homeland Security unveils sweeping plan to deport … – USA Today

Immigration rallies held around US to support Muslims – ABC News

US immigration raids leave many ‘afraid to open the door’ – BBC News

Breaking news on US immigration reform debate –

US Visa Immigration News and Updates – Path2usa

US immigration bill: Latest News & Videos, Photos about US …

American Immigration Lawyers Association: AILA

Trump Administration Expands Enforcement of US Immigration Laws

Why Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Could Sink U.S. Home Prices …

US ramps up crackdown on illegal immigrants – Financial Times

Immigration News – NumbersUSA

Trump administration plans could lead to vast increase in deportations …

Trump’s immigration plan could cost billions, experts say – NY Daily …

US sets sweeping crackdown on nearly all illegal immigrants | Inquirer …

News Releases | ICE

President Trump’s Immigration Policy Takes Shape – The Atlantic

Murthy Law Firm : U.S. Immigration Law

U.S. Immigration News | Allen and Hodgman

Donald Trump speaks out about immigration in Sweden | The …



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s